Crab fishery working group

This working group provides operational advice on the management of the Queensland crab fishery, which predominantly harvests mud crabs and blue swimmer crabs. The spanner crab fishery is managed separately.

Meetings

  • 12-13 October 2017

    The crab fishery working group met for the first time in Brisbane on the 12th and 13th of October.

    The working group was provided an overview of the Sustainable Fisheries Strategy (the Strategy). The members discussed the key policy objectives and how their input will be used to shape the future management of the crab fishery.

    Fisheries Queensland provided an outline of the current status of the fishery.  The working group noted that all stocks are currently assessed as sustainable under the Status of Australian Fish Stocks report. The working group discussed the current catch trends and what factors are driving recent trends. It was noted by members that catch information in all sectors requires further validation and assessment.

    Fisheries Queensland provided information on the Monitoring and Research Plan, which outlines where the initial investment in monitoring and data under the Strategy will be focused. Working group members suggested that better communication with stakeholders would improve current perceptions around the monitoring programs. It was identified that the future direction of research and monitoring would be guided by the harvest strategies.

    The working group discussed the Queensland Harvest Strategy Policy and Guideline. The members noted that a harvest strategy would provide more certainty by outlining predetermined management actions  based on agreed indicators for fishery performance.  Fisheries Queensland will assist the working group with developing the harvest strategies and will undertake consultation with broader fishery stakeholders as development progresses.

    The working group members discussed current issues in the crab fisheries.  Members noted the need to manage the transfer and distribution of effort to meet the Wildlife Trade Operations requirements. Other issues that were of concern to the working group included compliance, localised fishing pressures, data quality, excess effort and access.

    The working group noted that commercial crab boats would require vessel tracking by the end of 2018 and was shown an example vessel tracking unit. The members identified issues relating to the operationalisation of vessel tracking including the ability to transfer between vessels and the need for manual processes if a device is malfunctioning. Further consultation on business rules will be undertaken with all stakeholders later in 2017.

    To start the harvest strategy process, the working group was asked to identify key fishery objectives to set out the direction and aspirations for the fishery. The following draft objectives were recommended by the working group to:

    • ensure that harvest of crab resources is sustainable (sustainability);
    • improve the understanding of crab fishery interactions with non-target species to determine the level of risk (sustainability);
    • maximise profitability of the commercial crab fishery (economic);
    • enhance economic benefits for the broader community (economic);
    • improve and maintain high catch rates for all sectors of the fishery (social);
    • ensure all sectors are satisfied with their share in the resource (social);
    • reduce excess capacity and conflict in the fishery (social); and
    • ensure fisheries management is meeting the expectation of sectors and the community (social).

    The working group was then asked to identify management units which will define the scope of the harvest strategy. The working group noted that the Strategy identifies a preference to manage at the stock level. In regard to this, the working group recommended the following draft management units for the crab fishery:

    • Queensland blue swimmer crab
    • Gulf of Carpentaria mud crab
    • East coast mud crab

    The members discussed management reform options that would enable the fishery to be managed to achieve these objectives and management units. The working group agreed that the crab fishery was suitable for quota management (with separate quota for mud and blue swimmer crab). The working group also agreed that there was a need to set blue swimmer crab possession limits for recreational fishers. The catch of all sectors would be adjusted up or down depending on the performance of the fishery. The  working group also agreed limits should be maintained on the take of blue swimmer crab in the trawl fishery and adjusted as necessary depending on the performance of the stock. The working group recognised that there are still a number of unresolved questions around quota allocation, effort reduction, timing of reforms and catch limits.

    The working group was concluded with a discussion around the next steps that need to be taken for transitioning the crab fishery to a harvest strategy framework (e.g. developing appropriate management units, allocating access and where necessary, implementing structural adjustment).

    Future working group meetings are scheduled for December and February to refine the objectives, units and reform options. Fisheries Queensland will be seeking the views of all stakeholders throughout the process.

    The Crab Working Group members are: Fisheries Queensland (Chair- Mark Doohan), commercial fishing (Ben Day, Peter Jackson, Anne Tooker and Keith Harris), recreational fishing (David Bateman, George Bennetts, Wayne Bonham, Michael Detenon) and Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend)

  • 15 December 2017

    The second meeting of the crab working group was held by teleconference on 15 December 2017.

    The working group reviewed a range of catch, effort and location data to gain a better understanding of what’s happening and to inform the best approach the reform process. Further analysis of available information on the crab fishery, including compliance/infringement matters, and traditional fishing and commercial catch by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities will be considered at the third meeting.

    The working group considered a revised set of crab fishery objectives which set out the vision from all stakeholder groups for the fishery and will guide management of the fishery.  The working group advised that it will be important to understand how the objectives will influence management of the fishery and noted that this will become clearer as the operational components of the harvest strategy are developed.

    The working group confirmed a number of proposals that will be the basis of the first round of engagement with all fishery stakeholders. The working group will consider a final draft of the discussion paper out-of-session to enable Fisheries Queensland to release it in early 2018.  Feedback on the draft objectives, management units and reform options will be critical in informing the development of a harvest strategy.

    While members agreed in principle that prohibiting the take of C-grade crab could improve the value of the resource and may contribute to their sustainability, the working group noted that it would likely be difficult to describe in legislation and enforce. While some members were concerned about not proceeding with a prohibition at this time, it was acknowledged that developing a harvest strategy and moving to quota may have more of an impact than additional regulation.  Fisheries Queensland have agreed to reconsider this matter, if it is still a concern, once a harvest strategy has been operational for at least 12 months.

    Fisheries Queensland discussed the steps and timeframes for reform, harvest strategy development and consultation during 2018. The working group noted that the importance of a range of consultation steps with broader fisheries stakeholders and the need to align with government processes.

    The next meeting, to be held jointly with the Sustainable Fisheries Expert Panel meeting, will be in late February or Early March.

    Crab working group members:

    • Fisheries Queensland - Chair- Mark Doohan
    • Commercial fishing - Ben Day, Peter Jackson, Anne Tooker, Keith Harris
    • Recreational fishing - David Bateman, George Bennetts, Wayne Bonham, Michael Detenon
    • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority - James Aumend.
  • 5-6 March 2018

    The third meeting of the crab fishery working group was held in Brisbane over 5-6 March 2018. The purpose of this meeting was to endorse a discussion paper outlining management units and reform options for the fishery. The discussion paper will be distributed for broader stakeholder feedback at the end of March.

    The meeting endorsed the previous meetings minutes, and noted the Queensland Fisheries social media statistics for the previous crab working group communique (15 December 2017) reached 5,805 people.

    Working group members noted an update on the vessel tracking trial and the vessel tracking policy and guidelines consultation, which ended on 23 February. Major concerns raised by members included the cost of units, confidentiality issues, risk of unit failures, and reception issues for manual reporting options.

    Crab fishery monitoring and research update was presented to the working group. Working group members were advised that Fisheries Queensland had conducted a beam trawl survey for blue swimmer crabs in 2017 from the Gold Coast to Hervey Bay to look at blue swimmer crab recruitment. This data may inform a harvest strategy for the blue swimmer crab fishery. Fisheries Queensland boat ramp survey project results noted that 3485 interviews were conducted with people who caught either mud crabs or blue swimmer crabs in 2017. Retained catch numbers for mud crabs was 4500 and 3800 blue swimmer crabs.

    Fisheries Queensland provided information on the additional investment in social and economic monitoring under the Sustainable Fisheries Strategy. Working group members noted that a workshop with experts had been held to identify social and economic indicators and the requirements to roll out a successful monitoring program. This will include seeking advice from the Working Group to develop priority social and economic indicators for the crab fishery.

    Fisheries Queensland presented an update on the status of Ecological Risk Assessments, noting that draft ERA guidelines were being reviewed by the Expert Panel. Working group members will be engaged throughout the ERA process.

    Subject to a number of amendments, the working group endorsed a draft discussion paper which outlines the proposed objectives, management units and reform options.

    The proposed management units for the crab fishery are:

    • Gulf of Carpentaria mud crab
    • East coast mud crab; and
    • Blue swimmer crab (all Queensland waters).

    The discussion paper proposes a number of management reform options, including ITQ’s, symbol amalgamation, and ongoing adjustment of recreational limits in line with harvest strategy objectives. It was noted that no decisions have been made and that the discussion paper is simply the basis for an initial round of engagement. Consultation feedback from the discussion paper will inform the working group when they are formulating advice on preferred reform options and implementation plan, including allocation if relevant, for review by the Sustainable Fisheries Expert Panel in July 2018.

    Fisheries Queensland outlined the range of commercial sector allocation options available for use when allocating fisheries entitlements. Working group members noted general principles for use in an allocation process:

    • Consistency with fishery objectives;
    • Fairness and equity;
    • Increased benefits.

    The working group identified the following issues as important when considering allocation:

    • recognise current entitlement in the fishery
    • minimise wealth re-distribution
    • the need for validated historical catch (if used)
    • recognise previous investment warnings
    • quota entitlement to be in line with other fisheries i.e. in perpetuity
    • minimum and maximum quota holdings.

    The working group did not consider any changes to the current single sex harvest policy is appropriate until a management framework and harvest strategy is in place.

    A joint session with the Sustainable Fisheries Expert Panel was held after the working group meeting. The session involved a workshop on research priorities under the monitoring and research plan, and allowed members to engage in a Q&A session with the Expert Panel.

    A further working group meeting is planned for June 18 and 19 2018. Fisheries Queensland will be seeking the views of all stakeholders through face-to-face consultation, expected to take place throughout April-May.

    The Crab Working Group members are: Fisheries Queensland (Chair- Mark Doohan), commercial fishing (Ben Day, Peter Jackson, Anne Tooker and Keith Harris), recreational fishing (David Bateman, George Bennetts, Wayne Bonham, Michael Detenon) and Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend).

  • 13-14 June 2018

    The fourth meeting of the crab working group was held in Brisbane over 13 and 14 June 2018. The purpose of this meeting was to consider the consultation feedback from the discussion paper and further refine the fishery reform options to provide a recommendation to the expert panel in late July 2018.

    Working group members were provided a general update on key sustainable fisheries strategy actions, policy development and implementation progress. Members sought clarification on the purpose of the recently released Reallocation Policy, and noted that it essentially outlines the steps and key considerations when the access to fisheries resources between sectors is to be changed.

    The working group heard a presentation from NSW Fisheries, and a NSW commercial fisher from Yamba joined the meeting. The working group noted that the measures introduced by NSW were primarily to address fisher viability rather than stock sustainability issues. The reforms were difficult, but have ultimately led to less commercial fishers competing for the resource. Fisher profitability and the value of capital investment has improved, and confidence in stock monitoring and quota validation is supported through a mobile phone app. The working group appreciated the insights from the NSW experience and noted opportunities to collaborate further.

    The results of consultation for the crab fishery discussion paper and proposed Act amendments were presented to the group. Each member outlined the feedback they received from their sectoral group and own communities in relation to the discussion paper proposals. Most members expressed some disappointment at the lack of engagement, and had expected that more recreational and commercial fishers would be responding to the reform ideas, and noted that further work to better engage and educate stakeholders on the reform process is needed. A report compiling the results of the survey will be made publicly available in coming months.

    The working group noted the following key consultation results:

    • Management units as proposed in the discussion paper were supported, however most recreational fishers, conservation group and GBRMPA noted a preference to manage the mud crab fishery at a finer spatial scale on the east coast.
    • Around two thirds of commercial fishers preferred ITQ over other reform options and this division was somewhat reflected in the face to face port visits, individual submissions and group submissions.
    • The use of tags for the commercial sector for quota validation and to address black marketing had widespread support from all sectors.
    • There was strong support from the recreational sector to introduce a recreational bag limit for blue swimmer crabs and boat limits for both blue swimmer crabs and mud crabs. Support for a reduction in the bag limit of mud crabs was also generally supported.

    Fisheries Queensland presented the draft fishery objectives and explained how these objectives will be used in the development of the harvest strategy to develop operational objectives. The working group agreed with the fishery objectives and no specific changes were proposed, noting that they may be refined to ensure consistency with other fisheries.

    A presentation on estimating biomass and developing proxies and indicators provided an outline of what kinds of stock assessment models are available for crab stocks. While there was an acknowledgement that mud crab stocks are likely to be considered robust based on their biological characteristics, effort has expanded dramatically in recent years. Given the influence of environmental conditions at the local scale, it was noted that the east coast stocks are best assessed regionally, and that this would inform the overall quota, using multiple lines of evidence from stock models, catch data and environmental conditions.

    In considering the results of consultation, the issues facing the fishery and the need to ensure a framework that is consistent with managing crab stocks effectively through a harvest strategy, the working group recommended the following ‘in principle’ positions in relation to crab fishery management:

    • Three management units that reflect the genetic fish stocks – blue swimmer crab (whole state), mud crab Gulf of Carpentaria and mud crab east coast;
    • Individual Transferable Quota’s (ITQ) to cap the commercial crab harvest in each of the three management units;
    • The use of tags to identify commercially caught product, that will assist in ensuring integrity with the quota system, and address crab black marketing;
    • Recreational blue swimmer crab in possession limit proposed as 20, with 40 boat limit;
    • Recreational mud crab in possession limit proposed as 5 - 6, with 10 - 12 boat limit (noting that two of the four recreational fishers on the working group did not support this limit, but did support a reduction only in line with a commensurate reduction of the commercial sector in the harvest strategy);
    • An annual closure that would apply to all sectors might afford an opportunity to address ghost potting issues, however the length of the closure and time of closure needs further investigation (whole state/hot spots/rolling regional);
    • Crab pot apparatus review to require escape vents for all sectors and prohibit the use of some recreational pots with large entrances. Further investigation on the use of neutral buoyancy rope is also recommended.
    • Blue swimmer crabs re-affirmed as a non-target species for trawl. Consideration be given to reviewing trawl access to crabs with further advice to be sought from the trawl fishery working group.

    The total number of pots permitted to be used in the fishery by the commercial sector be reviewed through the harvest strategy if an ITQ management system does not address the issues associated with excessive effort. Likewise, finer spatial management could be triggered for areas where local depletion or excessive effort is still occurring. Improved data with vessel tracking and validated logbooks will assist in developing the harvest strategy measures to deal with these matters.

    The working group noted that in introducing an ITQ an allocation process will be required. It was noted that it will be a difficult process, and discussed a number of general principles that could apply in this process. The working group will consider allocation options, models and receive further advice from the Expert Panel on eligibility criteria at the next meeting. The risks of over allocating the initial quota were noted by the working group.

    Members noted the next steps in developing the harvest strategy and to further refine the options for reform. A further meeting was scheduled for September to draft harvest strategies and review proposed regulatory changes.

    The Crab Working Group members are: Fisheries Queensland (Chair – Mark Doohan), commercial fishing (Keith Harris, Anne Tooker, Ben Day, Peter Jackson), recreational fishing (David Bateman, George Bennetts, Wayne Bonham, Michael Detenon), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend), Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol (Rob McDonald), Animal Science Queensland (Julie Robins).

  • 12-13 September 2018

    The fifth meeting of the crab working group was held in Brisbane over 12 and 13 Sept 2018. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the feedback from the Sustainable Fisheries Expert Panel on the package of reform options and to consider quota allocation principles and models for the allocation of Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ).

    Working group members were provided a general update on key sustainable fisheries strategy actions, policy development and implementation progress. It was outlined that the review of the Fisheries Act is progressing with a Bill being introduced to the Parliament last week. It was also noted that the vessel tracking rebate scheme was released to provide support to fishers for the cost of units and installation. Members sought clarification on the rebate and how it relates to different devices. It was noted some units had been nominated for specific fisheries and that rebates vary depending on the unit purchased units, which has been outlined in the information recently provided to fishers.

    Expert Panel feedback

    Associate Prof. Ian Tibbets, Chair of the Sustainable Fisheries Expert Panel attended part of the working group meeting to gain a deeper understanding of the issues facing the crab fishery and to provide feedback from the Expert Panel’s perspective. Largely, as noted in their communique, the Expert Panel supported the proposed reforms recommended by the crab fishery working group and noted that they were consistent with addressing the objectives of the Sustainable Fisheries Strategy.  Members agreed that they were currently focused on the reform issues, and that specific harvest strategy mechanisms to address other issues (such as localised excessive effort) are yet to be considered in detail. The working group felt that total allowable commercial catch (TACC) setting decision rules and harvest strategy references and trigger points would be better considered once the effect of the initial reforms was understood.

    Setting quota

    The working group heard from Animal Science of Agri Science Queensland (DAF) scientists on the methods available to establish appropriate TAC limits for each of the East Coast, Gulf of Carpentaria mud crab fisheries and the blue swimmer crab fishery. In the absence of formal stock assessments, or sufficient data to run more complex stock models, an initial nominal TACC could be based on a 7 year reported catch average. Further analysis and assumptions would need to be applied to account for a total allowable catch (TAC) of all sectors’ harvest.

    A maximum economic yield (MEY) estimate was presented for blue swimmer crab using the 2014 stock assessment model. It was noted that a standardised catch rate is currently being developed for mud crab that may allow for a baseline mud crab MSY estimates in the near future. Advice on potential TAC and TACC for all sectors will be presented to the working group at its next meeting.

    NT crab fishery

    The working group heard a presentation from Northern Territory Department of Primary Industries and Resources on their mud crab fishery research and management. The NT fishery currently has a harvest strategy in place that aims to maintain catch rates at sustainable levels. The working group noted that work is currently underway to better incorporate environmental parameters into decision making, as these have significantly influenced catchability of crabs in the Gulf of Carpentaria in recent years. The working group hoped to be able to also include environmental parameters in Queensland crab fisheries’ harvest strategies going forward.

    Bycatch reduction device trials in NT showed that there was a significant reduction in bycatch, catch of juvenile mud crabs, cannibalism and post-harvest mortality in pots with these devices. They also noted escape vents can increase the catch of legal size crabs by 10-30%. The working group supported the introduction of such devices in all sectors’ pots, noting a transition period would need to apply to allow the retrofitting of existing apparatus and to provide time for manufacturers to build and supply compliant pots.

    ITQ Allocation

    The working group noted that in order to operationalise an ITQ system, a quota allocation policy was currently being drafted for industry consultation.

    The working group discussed a number of quota allocation principles and models. A number of aspects were considered critical to the success of any system, including:

    • A C1 symbol attached to a commercial fishing boat licence is necessary to be eligible for an allocation.
    • Only annual mud crab catch history up to a maximum of 6 tonnes (1 x C1) or 12 tonnes (2 x C1) should be taken into account for any allocation process, as these represent an estimated physical limit of how much crab can feasibly be caught in a year per symbol, which will help to address possible over-reporting.
    • The seven financial year period from 2010/11 to 2016/17 is an appropriate period to establish fishers relative economic position for the purposes of allocation.
    • The following allocation scenarios should be investigated further and figures provided to fishers on what they would mean for them:
      • average catch over the 7 years,
      • average catch weighted 60% before the investment warning and 40% after
      • average catch weighted 40% before the investment warning and 60% after
      • other options such as average of best 6 years from 7 years
    • No quota eligibility criteria should be used to reduce the number of fishers initially eligible for an allocation – fishers would receive whatever level the final quota allocation formula calculates.
    • A base equal allocation is not considered necessary as a C1 symbol will continue to provide a 50 pot fishing entitlement.
    • Minimum unit holdings after the initial allocation could be used to facilitate consolidation of quota and to ensure autonomous restructuring occurs to improve economic viability and achieve the targets in the Sustainable Fisheries Strategy.

    The working group wanted to ensure that catch allocations were as equitable and fair as possible, noting that fishers who had more years of participation should be appropriately recognised in the allocation formula. Working group members noted that a draft allocation policy and indicative allocation figures for individual licence holders under the different models would be released for consultation in coming months.

    Ghost pot clean up

    The working group had previously considered and supported in principle the concept of a closure to enable abandoned or lost pots to be removed. Further consideration of the details of this concept have identified some issues, including the absence of a period of time that would suit a blanket ‘no pots in water’ rule due to differences in seasonality of mud and blue swimmer crabs. The financial impost of a closure and the logistical difficulties in removing up to 100 pots on the commercial sector outweighs the benefits of a closure period, when there may be alternative ways to achieve the same outcomes. The working group agreed that any approach be consistent for commercial and recreational sectors.

    Some alternatives to achieve a window of time to allow a pot clean up included the following options:

    • rolling regional community clean ups;
    • tags to identify if pots are being worked to exempt them from a ‘clean up’ during a defined period of time;
    • requiring the use of standardised heavier pots that are less likely to be lost; or
    • implementing a trigger for further management action in the harvest strategy if the number of abandoned pots/ghost pots are not reducing over time.

    Tags

    The working group noted that the first generation of a tagging scheme for the commercial mud crab fishery should include features that will address quota compliance, significantly minimise black marketing and provide marketing advantages and opportunities for fishers (provenance tracking). There are still many details to work out in order to operationalise a tagging system, and the working group views will continue to be sought to finalise a workable arrangement.

    Other regulation amendments

    The working group discussed a number of minor regulatory amendments that will be necessary as part of the remake of the Fisheries Regulation in 2019 to support the reform and harvest strategy processes.

    The working group discussed possession limits for blue swimmer crabs and mud crabs. The working group noted the previously recommendation concerning the recreational blue swimmer crab in possession limit as 20, with a possible 40 boat limit. It was highlighted that the boat limit is being introduced for priority black market species only, and as blue swimmer crab are not a priority black market species, a boat limit may not be required.

    The proposed reduction in the possession limit for mud crabs was again discussed, with most members supporting 5 – 6 crabs, with 10 - 12 boat limit. However some recreational members offered 7 instead, as long as there was a similar reduction in the commercial quota.

    The working group agreed that a separate sub-working group be developed to engage with blue swimmer crab fishers who are both multi endorsed or dedicated blue swimmer crab fishers.

    Next steps

    Members noted the next steps in developing the harvest strategy and to further refine the options for reform. Fisheries Queensland aims to undertake broader industry consultation on the ITQ allocation formula before the end of the year.   A further meeting was scheduled for 12-13 December to draft harvest strategies and review proposed regulatory changes.

    Fisheries Queensland (Chair – Mark Doohan), commercial fishing (Keith Harris, Anne Tooker, Ben Day, Peter Jackson), recreational fishing (David Bateman, Wayne Bonham, Michael Detenon), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend), Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol (David Kahler), Animal Science of Agi Science Queensland (Julie Robins).

  • 12-13 December 2018

    The sixth meeting of the crab working group was held in Brisbane over 12 and 13 December 2018. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss implementing the recommended management package, total allowable catch limits, ecological risk assessments, bycatch reduction options, quota allocation principles, and harvest strategy concepts.

    Working group members noted the expert panel feedback to harvest strategy development was simple decision rules are preferable, and objectives that are measurable are critical for an effective harvest strategy. The expert panel also clarified that a fishery-wide one month closure is not the only way to achieve abandoned pot clean ups, and that alternative solutions, such as coordinated rolling regional closures, may be more appropriate.

    The Queensland Government is currently considering the recommended management package and a direction will be communicated with stakeholders in early 2019. Following this, Fisheries Queensland will undertake targeted consultation with commercial fishers on fishery specific allocation principles (if required). Broader public consultation on all the proposed changes to the Fisheries Regulation 2008 will follow.  Taking into account consultation results, government will consider the changes to the Fisheries Regulation 2008 by September 2019 with implementation of the reforms to commence from 2020.

    The working group noted the information from the blue swimmer crab workshop held on 9 November including allocation principles, options for a blue swimmer crab harvest strategy, total allowable catch and regulation amendments.

    Total Allowable Catches

    Agri-Science Queensland (ASQ) presented an analysis of crab harvest to inform initial total allowable catches (TAC) for the Gulf of Carpentaria and the East Coast mud crab fisheries.

    East Coast Mud Crab

    Under the various catch model scenarios presented, 1000 tonnes (recreational and commercial combined) was considered the most appropriate TAC for the East Coast mud crab fishery to achieve the Sustainable Fishery Strategy (the Strategy) target of 60% biomass by 2027. Given the estimated recreational proportion of 27% for the east coast total mud crab catch, this equates to:

    • Total allowable commercial catch of around 730 tonnes
    • Total allowable recreational catch of around 270 tonnes

    Gulf of Carpentaria Mud Crab

    For the Gulf of Carpentaria mud crab fishery, a TAC of 110 tonnes (recreational and commercial combined) was considered the most appropriate to achieve the Strategy target of 60% biomass by 2027. Given the estimated recreational proportion of 12% for the Gulf of Carpentaria total mud crab catch, this equates to:

    •  
    • Total allowable commercial catch of around 97 tonnes
    • Total allowable recreational catch of around 13 tonnes

    To achieve the 270 tonnes (east coast mud crab) recreational total allowable catch, a reduction in the current in possession limit of 10 will be required, alongside a boat limit. For consistency, these same limits will be applied to the Gulf of Carpentaria recreational sector.

    Overall, the working group noted that the mud crab fishery was on track to achieve the Strategy targets, if the commercial catch was capped and appropriate recreational in possession and boat limits were implemented. The working group has requested some additional TAC modelling for the next meeting to determine the feasibility of setting a slightly higher TAC and how much confidence there is in the modelling that this would meet the Strategy targets by 2027.

    Blue swimmer crab

    The working group noted that 2014 BSC stock assessment is an age based simulation model and the Expert Panel recommended it may be more appropriate to simply set the blue swimmer crab commercial total allowable catch based on the last 5-year average catch of 325 tonnes (all regions).

    The working group had previously considered 20 crabs recreational in possession limit for blue swimmer crabs appropriate, but is keen that a boat limit of 40 also be considered as a means to pre-empt black-marketing risks.

    While a total allowable commercial catch is primarily introduced to address stock sustainability, it can also impact on other management objectives. The working group noted the recommended commercial total allowable catch will drive structural adjustment in the commercial sector resulting in a reduction in commercial fishing platforms. Given economic viability in the crab fishery is a key issue, this is ultimately a desirable outcome. All members were mindful that implementation of a commercial total allowable catch may have a financial impact on those fishers who may need to adjust their quota holdings.

    Economic and Social Monitoring

    The crab working group noted an economic and social monitoring project is currently underway as part of the Strategy. Possible economic and social indicators were presented to the working group that can measure economic performance and social factors about fisheries in Queensland. A third party will be contracted in 2019 to begin collecting data and will be rolled out to all major commercial fisheries in Queensland. Commercial fishers will be asked to participate in the project on a voluntary basis. The project is likely to have strong benefits to industry in providing economic and social information to improve management decisions. Economic and social data is also being collected in the recreational sector under a range of recreational fishing surveys.

    Ecological Risk Assessment

    Fisheries Queensland presented the draft whole-of-fishery (Level 1) Ecological Risk Assessment for the crab fishery for the working group to provide feedback on. The working group noted that the current (pre-reform) management high/intermediate risks related to the inability to control total catch, inability to effectively track spatial shifts in effort, unreported/illegal harvest and interactions with marine turtles. The working group expect that the proposed reforms in the crab fishery will address all key risks and should result in a reduced risk rating across for the high and intermediate risks identified.

    Bycatch Reduction Devices

    The working group considered the use of bycatch reduction devices (BRD) in the crab fishery. The specifications and effectiveness of BRD’s for pots used for mud crab is documented, but not known for blue swimmer crab. Given that commercial and recreational fishers target blue swimmer crab and mud crabs with the same pots, mandating BRD use across all crab sectors is not feasible. The working group considered two options – either regulate the use of BRD’s in commercial mud crab pots only, or promote their use voluntarily through a code of conduct. Working group views were varied as to the preferred approach.

    Legislation

    The working group discussed a number of regulatory amendments to support the crab fisheries reforms and harvest strategy processes, including:

    • a ban on the use of lightweight pots to prevent loss, with a five year transition period;
    • defining ‘actively worked pot’ and when commercial pots must be removed;
    • tagging commercial mud crabs (next meeting will focus on operational procedures);
    • abandoned pot definition;
    • boat size requirements for the commercial sector; and
    • crab meat issues.

    The working group noted that under the Fisheries (Sustainable Fisheries Strategy) Amendment Bill 2018, being considered by Parliament, there are a range of proposals to strengthen the enforcement powers of fisheries inspectors and penalties to address serious fisheries offences such as black-marketing.

    Allocation

    The working group reviewed its previous recommendations in relation to proposed allocation formula and principles for mud crab (east coast and Gulf of Carpentaria) and blue swimmer crab. The working group affirmed and recommended the following principles:

    • A C1 symbol attached to a commercial fishing boat licence is necessary to be eligible for an allocation.
    • Only annual mud crab catch history up to a maximum of 6 tonnes (1 x C1) or 12 tonnes (2 x C1) should be taken into account for any allocation process as this represents a limit of how much can be feasibly caught in 1 year for 1 x C1 symbol (50 pots) and to address past over-reporting.
    • Consideration needs to be given to a similar blue swimmer crab reported cap for the purposes of addressing over reporting or catch history that includes illegal product.
    • To be eligible for the higher level of annual catch history (e.g. 12 tonnes for mud crab) the 2 x C1’s must have been written on the licence during the year/s (2014/15 to 2016/17) for that higher cap to apply.
    • To be eligible for the higher catch history, 2 x C1’s must be written on the commercial fishing boat licence on the quota allocation date also.
    • The seven financial year period from 2010/11 to 2016/17 is an appropriate period to establish fisher’s relative economic position for the purposes of allocation. The best 6 years from the 7 year period (2010/11 to 2016/17) is preferred.
    • No eligibility criteria should be used to reduce the number of fishers initially eligible for an allocation – fishers would receive whatever level the final quota allocation formula calculates
    • A base equal allocation is not considered necessary as a C1 will continue to provide access to a 50 pot entitlement
    • Minimum unit holdings after the initial allocation could be used to facilitate consolidation of quota and to ensure autonomous restructuring occurs to improve economic viability and achieve the targets in the Sustainable Fisheries Strategy.

    Fisheries Queensland (Chair – Mark Doohan), commercial fishing (Keith Harris, Anne Tooker, Ben Day, Peter Jackson), recreational fishing (David Bateman, George Bennetts, Wayne Bonham, Michael Detenon), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend), Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol (David Kahler), Animal Science Queensland (Julie Robins).

  • 12-13 March 2019

    The seventh meeting of the crab working group was held in Brisbane over 12 and 13 March 2019. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the detail of the recommended management package, including: total allowable catch for mud crabs, finalising the regulation amendments, bycatch reduction options and harvest strategy concepts.

    Working group members noted an update on delivering the SFS and the Queensland Government’s recently released Directions Paper. A number of changes were outlined for the crab fishery including:

    • three management units (east coast mud crab, Gulf of Carpentaria mud crab and blue swimmer crab all Queensland waters)
    • individual transferable quota and commercial crab tagging
    • review recreational limits and consider a boat limit
    • measures to address bycatch, protected species and interactions with apparatus.

    Allocation discussion papers for the crab, east coast inshore and trawl fisheries are expected to be released, providing commercial fishers the opportunity to review allocation proposals. Broader public consultation on all the proposed changes to the Fisheries Regulation 2008 will follow mid-2019.

    Progress on implementing vessel tracking was noted. The working group was advised that 1400 units had been purchased to date, with 1000 of these activated. The ‘fault’ rate (installation, invoicing, unit, registration issues) is considered quite low, at 5%.  Fisheries Queensland is committed to working with industry to case manage issues as they arise.

    The working group reviewed information on other fisheries that have moved to individual transferable quota and noted the large change in catch and effort immediately following implementation. The reasons for the reduction are difficult to pin point and can be a combination of many factors, including: improved reporting, quota consolidation, recent entrants not receiving quota, fishing behaviour and responding to market changes.

    The working group noted the draft report outlining the results of the catch-MSY modelling based on commercial catch information. Results suggested a very high confidence (over 90%) that stocks could attain 60% SFS biomass targets by 2027 with a total allowable catch (all sectors) of 1000 tonnes for east coast mud crab and 110 tonnes Gulf of Carpentaria mud crab. Taking into account the estimated sectoral allocation proportions, this means a Total Allowable Commercial Catch (TACC) of 730 tonnes for east coast and 97 tonnes for the Gulf of Carpentaria.

    The proposed mud crab TACC for the east coast stock is considered by some members to be very high, compared with information sourced through market research and transport company manifests about the quantity of Queensland crab sold. They were concerned that there would be negative impacts to the reform outcomes if the initial TACC was set too high. A harvest strategy can address these concerns in part, by reviewing TACCs within two years when validated catch is received. A minimum quota holding (fishers can only commence fishing if they hold a minimum amount of quota or units) could also be a mechanism to drive structural adjustment if necessary.

    Noting the limited data and fundamental changes following management reform, the initial harvest strategy should set simple reference points based on total sectoral harvest. Once reforms are implemented, data quality (vessel tracking, quota usage and boat ramp surveys) will improve, allowing a harvest strategy to be based on biomass targets.

    The working group considered the most appropriate time for the commencement of the harvest strategy, and therefore the quota season. Based on their usual life cycle and biological characteristics, the low commercial effort observed in the months September to November, the working group considered that a better annual quota season might be from 1 December each year. Fisheries Queensland will consider this along with other important implementation matters (data availability, assessment delivery and legislative processes).

    Two potential harvest strategy models were considered by the working group. After much discussion, the working group identified a preferred harvest strategy framework which included annual quota setting for the first five years to ensure the TACC was set close to actual harvest levels. Longer term, the aim is to set the TAC’s regularly based on stock assessments at agreed intervals (2, 3 or 5 years), incorporating recreational catch data as it becomes available.

    The working group discussed the regulatory amendments to support the crab fisheries reform and harvest strategy processes. These amendments will be released for public consultation later in the year.  A key recommendation from the working group was to look at restricting recreational collapsible pots to between 800mm and 1.2m diameter to remove small lightweight pots. Increasing the size of the steel rings (8mm) would also be beneficial. It was noted that Fisheries Queensland will likely introduce a bycatch policy that is linked to the regulation, but can be adjusted and improved if necessary.

    The working group discussed the operational aspects of tagging commercial mud crabs in Queensland including: tag distribution, transferring tags to other fishers and lease holders, and compliance issues e.g. tagging crabs prior to landing point. It was noted that Fisheries Queensland is currently drafting an operational policy for tags, which will be provided to the working group for input prior to going to industry for comment.

    The next meeting of the working group will be held in June 2019, and will finalise the harvest strategy framework and tagging operational procedures.

    The working group members are: Fisheries Queensland (Chair – Mark Doohan), commercial fishing (Keith Harris, Anne Tooker, Ben Day, Peter Jackson), recreational fishing (David Bateman, George Bennetts, Wayne Bonham, Michael Detenon), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend), Animal Science Queensland (Julie Robins).

  • 9-10 July 2019

    The eighth meeting of the crab working group was held in Brisbane to consider feedback, to date, on the Discussion Paper on proposed changes for the Fisheries Regulation, review draft harvest strategies for mud crab and blue swimmer crab and provide advice on implementation of catch reporting and tags. The meeting welcomed observers from New South Wales Fisheries, who are embarking on their own harvest strategy journey shortly.

    Fisheries Queensland provided information on the Discussion Paper on proposed changes for the Fisheries Regulation (Discussion Paper) which outlines a number of proposed reforms and changes to the management of the crab fisheries. Consultation is open until 19 July 2019, and members noted this is the last chance for stakeholders to comment on a number of regulatory matters before they are considered by Government.

    The working group noted that the indicative individual allocations released with the Discussion Paper, were calculated on a revised allocation formula based on the seven calendar years 2011 to 2017. This varied from the initial allocation approach released in March 2019, which was based on the seven financial years 2010/11 to 2016/17. The working group compared the allocation modelling results from the two scenarios, and noted that more licence holders would receive less quota under the calendar year model. Considering this, it was recommended that the crab fishery allocation be based on the best six years from the seven year financial year period 2010/11 to 2016/17. This was supported by all working group members.

    There was considerable discussion how the proposed 1.2 tonne minimum holding in the mud crab fishery could be implemented. The working group were concerned that there may be ways to circumvent the proposed requirement which would reduce the effectiveness of the measure – to drive consolidation in the fishery. Because the crab fishery is a low operating cost but high value species, it is possible that not as much consolidation would occur as a result of introducing an ITQ system compared to other fisheries. Given this, the minimum quota holding was identified by the working group as a critical part of the reform. Fisheries Queensland will take into account the concerns identified by the working group, and consider how these could effectively addressed to best meet the objective of improving the economic viability of the industry.

    Working group members were presented with the details and rationale behind the proposed reporting requirements outlined in the Discussion Paper. Improved catch data and validation has been a common theme in this fishery and is constraining confidence in stock assessments and making meeting Commonwealth environment legislative requirements difficult.  Fisheries Queensland advised that it is a critical component of management going forward. A number of scenarios were worked through with the working group to explain the proposed reporting requirements. Members noted further consultation with industry was required and that considerable transitional, lead-in time and education would be critical to the successful implementation.

    Other proposed regulation amendments discussed included: requirements for buying and selling quota, restrictions around crab meat, transhipping, vessel size, apparatus and tagging. The working group discussion regarding bycatch devices centred around the practicality of a single definition of a suitable bycatch reduction device that can cover the commercial and recreational mud crab and blue swimmer crab fisheries throughout Queensland. The working group noted that this operational detail will be considered as part of the current consultation process. The working group recommended that Fisheries Queensland should invest in significant education activities for all sectors to implement the proposed reforms.

    The working group discussed the operational aspects of tagging commercial mud crabs in Queensland including: tag distribution, transferring tags to other fishers and lease holders, and compliance issues e.g. tagging crabs prior to landing point. It was noted that Fisheries Queensland is working on an operational policy for tags, based on learnings from the Queensland kangaroo harvest tagging program. This will be provided to working group members prior to broader education with industry.

    The working group revised the recommended quota season based on the likely start date of 1 July 2020. Rather than adopt a complicated pro-rata approach to establish a calendar year quota season, the working group agreed on a financial year quota season.  The working group spent considerable time reviewing and debating the details of the draft harvest strategies, and provided the following feedback:

    • Supported the proposed timeframes for reviewing rules that will trigger changes in the total allowable commercial catch (TACC) and recreational in-possession limits (Year 3)
    • Noted how and when sectoral catch shares between the recreational and commercial sectors would be calculated (updated information by Year 5)
    • Noted the proposed TACC’s for the east coast mud crab (730 t), Gulf mud crab (97 t) and blue swimmer crab (325 t) Towards an initial quota for the Qld mud crab fishery, Northrop, A., O'Neill, M. F. and Robins, J. (2019)
    • Noted the amount to be provided for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander commercial fishing development opportunities (10 t) through indigenous fishing permits
    • Supported harvest rules for ensuring trawl harvest of blue swimmer crab remains within their sectoral allocation (maintain 10% commercial harvest)
    • Supported options and timing for triggering spatial management (from Year 3)
    • Wanted to see options to ensure adequate structural adjustment to improve commercial viability (target catch rates and/or active licence numbers)

    The working group noted the Expert Panel recommendation that harvest strategies should be clear about the decision rules to be applied to ensure commensurate management responses for the recreational and the commercial sector alike and catch shares are maintained. Members agreed in principle that this be adopted, so that if the commercial sector quota was reduced, the recreational sector catch also be restricted in a commensurate manner. It was noted for recreational harvest, these would be determined using a number of indicators including the State-wide recreational survey, participation rates and boat ramp survey information.

    The next meeting of the working group will be held in October 2019, and will finalise the harvest strategy, consider tagging operational procedures and reform implementation matters.

    Fisheries Queensland (Chair – Mark Doohan), commercial fishing (Keith Harris, Anne Tooker, Ben Day, Peter Jackson), recreational fishing (David Bateman, George Bennetts, Michael Detenon), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend), Animal Science Queensland (Julie Robins).

  • 25-26 May 2021

    The tenth Crab Working Group meeting was held in Brisbane. The purpose of the meeting was to note the update of changes to the mud and blue swimmer crab fisheries, including new reporting and quota requirements and proposed total allowable commercial catch (TACC), and to discuss Wildlife Trade Operation (WTO) approvals.

    Fisheries Queensland provided a general update on:

    • the Sustainable Fisheries Strategy (the Strategy)
    • recent regulation changes
    • development of 13 harvest strategies in Queensland fisheries
    • the new commercial fishing app for electronic reporting

    Industry members provided an update on fishing operations in their local areas. Commercial operators commented that a large portion of industry is still confused about the reforms and new rules. Working group members were concerned that the department wasn’t spending enough time talking to fishers about the proposed changes particularly about quota and reporting arrangements. Members suggested that the department should suggest the fishers wanting to know about the operational requirements of reporting and further explanation of how quota worked could contact their local Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol (QBFP) office for an appointment to speak to an officer or face to face meetings with Fisheries Queensland staff and “How to” instructional videos.

    Members raised their concerns about industry’s understanding of the difference between quota units and how this translates to the number of kilograms that can be taken. Clarification was sought on the definition of when a fishing trip/operation begins and ends as well as the timeframes for reporting. The working group discussed the management and requirements of quota that is set aside for indigenous allocation. Industry members raised the requirement to continue to have flags on trot lines in the offshore component of the blue swimmer crab fishery given the introduction of vessel tracking. The need for progress in addressing the high risks to marine turtles identified in crab fishery ecological risk assessments, and the previous working group’s recommendation for restrictions on lightweight crab pots were also raised. Fisheries Queensland will explore the options for an engagement and education strategy and seek clarification regarding other issues raised.

    Fisheries Queensland provided an update of the draft mud and blue swimmer crab harvest strategies. 13 draft harvest strategies, including those for mud and blue swimmer crab, were open for public consultation from 30 September 2020 to 31 January 2021. A total of 138 surveys, 16 brief comments and 30 emails were received across all fisheries. The working group members discussed the responses received noting the mixed responses received and the large number of comments questioning the evidence and rationale behind the changes, general objection to quota or sectoral split and species-specific issues. Members discussed the quota allocation process and noted the decision to base eligible catch history on financial years rather than calendar years was made as it benefitted more industry participants.

    Members discussed the harvest strategy rules when one sector exceeds their sectorial split and instances where the TACC can increase or decrease. Members representing the commercial sector noted that all the decision rules were designed to facilitate a decrease in the TACC while the only opportunity to increase the TACC was subsequent to the conduct of the stock assessment.

    • East coast mud crab: 688,670 kg
    • Gulf of Carpentaria mud crab: 90,168kg
    • Blue swimmer crab: 242,982 kg

    The members noted that the first quota season is 10 months, running from 1 September 2021 to 30 June 2022. Fisheries Queensland proposed to pro-rata the TACC for the east coast mud crab, Gulf of Carpentaria mud crab and blue swimmer crab for the 2021-22 season based on the averages of historical September to June catches for the previous five financial years. The pro-rata amounts proposed are:

    The second year of the harvest strategies (2022-23) would commence with the full TACC. The minimum quota entitlement to be able to fish in the mud crab fishery will remain at 1.2 tonnes. Members advised Fisheries Queensland that some commercial fishers believe that the 1.2 tonnes is the minimum allocation provided to all eligible licence holders. Fisheries Queensland clarified for members that 1.2 tonnes is the minimum holding to be able to take mud crabs commercially, not the minimum quota allocation.

    The GBRMPA member raised concerns about the 33% exploitable biomass level estimated in the recent blue swimmer crab stock assessment and questioned the TACC being set at a much higher level than the 129 tonne recommended biological catch that the stock assessment recommended to rebuild the stock. GBRMPA recommended the TACC should be set much lower than the 263 tonne TACC proposed to rebuild the stock to the 60% exploitable biomass target by 2027. Fisheries Queensland advised that the recommended 129 tonne harvest limit was substantially less than what is currently being caught and would result in significant changes for all sectors and therefore adopted a longer rebuild strategy with a higher TACC.  The proposed 350 tonne TAC is based on a slower rebuild in approximately 10 years, noting a new stock assessment would be available in three years to inform future rebuilding.

    Fisheries Queensland provided a presentation on the methodology and outcomes from the BDO social and economic indicators report for commercial and charter fisheries. The working group noted the release of the BDO social and economic report for the crab fisheries with a dashboard accessible via the department’s website. Members discussed the available data and how it could be used to compare their individual operations with other industry participants. Caution should be exercised when comparing the social and economic benefits across different sectors. The ongoing collection of this data would also assist in identifying the changes pre and post reform. The ability to be able to determine the impacts of the reform agenda will assist the department in future reforms.  This project is currently ongoing and future results including recreational surveys will be presented at the next working group meeting.

    The working group noted the WTO approvals issued under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 for Queensland mud and blue swimmer crab fisheries are in place until 27 May 2022 and are subject to mandatory conditions some of which have not been met. The working group discussed the importance of maintaining WTO approvals for the crab fisheries and the implications if approvals were revoked or not renewed. Part 13A of the WTO relates to the export approvals and Part 13 of the WTO relates to interactions with protected species in Commonwealth waters. Members provided initial advice to Fisheries Queensland in favour of maintaining Part 13 and 13A with conditions of the WTO with a commitment to address by-catch mitigation strategies.

    The working group noted the recently completed and ongoing mud crab research. Currently, mud crab stock assessments are based on harvest data only. Other data sets such as size-frequency are required if more precise assessments are to be conducted.  Current research will assist in filling some of these gaps but will require the assistance from industry members via a permit.

    Fisheries Queensland provided an update on compliance activities in the recreational and commercial crab sectors from the previous 12 months. Both mud and blue swimmer crab compliance rates were similar to other fisheries with approximately 90% compliance of the units inspected. The large number of unattended and abandoned pots still present in waterways continues to be an issue and remains a high priority for QBFP. The prohibition of light-weight pots and extension of escape vent requirement to the recreational sector will be discussed in future meetings. New legislation has passed surrounding black marketing of priority species. This includes the taking of excess fisheries product with the sale or intention of sale of the product.

    Fisheries Queensland provided an update of legislative changes to the crab fisheries passed on 30 September 2020. Escape vent sizes and the placement on the bottom edge of the crab pots were discussed. The sizes and options of escape vents in regulation were based on research and to give industry some flexibility to choose an option that best suits their operation. Escape vents must be installed in the commercial crab apparatus used to take mud crabs by 1 September 2021. Review of escape vent requirements and issues will be discussed post implementation if required. Concerns were raised regarding mud crabs being retained from pots without escape vents while targeting blue swimmer crabs. Fisheries Queensland is in the progress of developing fact sheets for the crab fisheries and will be distributed to industry soon.

    The working group noted the new reporting and quota requirements that commence on 1 September 2021 including the 1.2 tonne minimum quota entitlement requirement for mud crab. Members raised concerns about the inability to land at private landing locations due to the new legislative requirements. Fisheries Queensland has taken the concerns into consideration and will be seeking approval to amend legislation to allow landing at private property. The landing location will need to be registered, open and accessible for inspection by an inspector. If not open for inspection, the ability to land at that location will not be permitted. Locations can also include places that are accessible by water. Further clarification is being sought about what constitutes the start and end of a fishing operation and when reporting needs to be completed when the primary vessel is used as a holding facility while at sea.

    Crabs will be required to be weighed on certified scales for the weight notice. Working group members asked if financial assistance could be made available to assist commercial operators purchase certified scales similar to arrangements put in place for the purchase of vessel tracking units. The weight differences between uncooked and cooked product was raised and whether there is a conversion factor for this when reporting the weight notice. Fisheries Queensland to also clarify if there is a need to keep product from different trips separated once reporting is complete. Some working group members expressed concerns about the complexity and duplication of the upcoming reporting requirements in the current form.

    Fisheries Queensland provided an update of the commercial fishing app. The first iteration of the app is scheduled 1 September 2021 and will include reporting for both mud and blue swimmer crab fisheries. The app will cover the entire fishing trip including reporting notices and logbooks. Users will have the ability to check quota balances when in data range as well as some functions that will have offline capabilities. Industry members suggested face to face workshops with videos would be most beneficial to educate industry on how to use the app. “How to” videos uploaded to FishNet would also be helpful.

    The next crab working group meeting is scheduled for October 2021 with discussions to include:

    • An update on research progress and preliminary findings
    • An update on new social and economic data including recreational survey results
    • An update on the WTO status
    • Development of by-catch mitigation strategies
    • Review of escape vent requirements
    • Progressing the removal of light weight crab pots
    • An update of latent effort, number of C1 symbols in use and quota movements post quota allocation
    • Clarification on reporting requirements and other actions from this meeting.

    Fisheries Queensland (Chair – Mark Doohan, Kimberly Foster, Tony Ham, Nancy Trieu, Rob McDonald), commercial fishing (Keith Harris, Anne Tooker, Ben Day, Peter Jackson, Nicholas Burr, Matthew Vickers), recreational fishing (David Bateman, George Bennetts, Wayne Bonham), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend), Animal Science Queensland (Julie Robins).

    Apologies (Kord Luckus).

  • 8 December 2021

    The Crab Working Group meeting was held in via teleconference. The purpose of the meeting was to note the implementation of reform to the mud and blue swimmer crab fisheries, current research and ecological risk assessment outcomes and to discuss the risk mitigation strategies to address Wildlife Trade Operation (WTO) conditions.

    Fisheries Queensland provided a general update on:

    • the Sustainable Fisheries Strategy (the Strategy)
    • recent regulation changes
    • implementation of the mud crab and blue swimmer crab harvest strategies and quota
    • high compliance rates with the new reforms that started 1 September 2021.

    Members were invited to provide an update on fishing operations in their local areas. Commercial operators noted that industry is adapting quite well to reforms that commenced on 1 September 2021. There were early teething issues with reporting, which seem to have been resolved or are currently being reviewed. Members have raised concerns regarding size and location of escape vents for mud crab apparatus and the requirement to have flags on trotlines in the blue swimmer crab fishery. Members reiterated the need to urgently progress the legislative changes to remove light-weight crab pots. Fisheries Queensland undertook to progress this change and other risk mitigation issues.

    Agri-science Queensland presented the progress to-date on the mud crab genetic stock structure research. One aim of the FRDC project is to utilise genetic analysis to assess the spatial stock structure of mud crabs. Preliminary analysis has revealed strong genetic differences between mud crabs from the East Coast and Gulf of Carpentaria. Mud crab genetic analysis has shown minimal latitudinal differences along the East Coast suggesting a single genetic stock for East Coast Queensland and New South Wales. Strong sex-linked markers have been identified which could potentially be used to develop a forensic compliance tool in future to detect illegal harvest of females for crab meat. Further work is underway to determine fine scale evaluation of the stock structure among east coast locations. Members discussed how results could be used to influence future management of the fishery.

    Fisheries Queensland presented the methodology and results of the 2019-20 state-wide recreational fishing survey. The results include recreational harvest, effort and expenditure and a range of other data which can be explored by region, species, year and other criteria. From April 2019 to April 2020, approximately 660,000 Queenslanders went recreational fishing in Queensland during the survey period. Queenslanders spent approximately $630 million on recreation fishing, generated an estimated $334 million in gross state product and supported 3,136 full time equivalent jobs. Approximately 798,000 mud crabs were caught and were the second most caught species across Queensland. Of these, 160,000 were kept and 638,000 were released. Approximately 235,000 blue swimmer crabs were caught with 78,000 being kept and 157,000 being released. Fisheries Queensland also answered questions on the state-wide boat ramp survey. The working group discussed member’s concerns about the methodology, data collected and accuracy of the recreational fishing data.

    Members noted the status and results of the scoping studyLevel 1 and Level 2 Ecological Risk Assessments (ERA) for the mud crab and blue swimmer crab fisheries. The assessments have identified that crabbing activity poses high risk to loggerhead turtles, green turtles and speartooth shark. Key drivers of risk for marine turtles and speartooth shark were conservative life history traits, potential to interact with fishing gear and mortality risk following an interaction. Recommendations to reduce turtle interactions with crab apparatus included improving data on interaction rates and release fate across the commercial and recreational sectors, examining fine scale effort data with marine turtle habitats, minimise risk of float line entanglements in active pots and minimising the risk of turtles getting trapped or entangled in ghost pots and float lines. Recommendations to reduce speartooth shark interactions with crab apparatus in the Gulf of Carpentaria included improving data on interaction rates and release fates across the commercial and recreational sectors and to identify mechanisms that minimise capture and entrapment in active pots.

    Marine turtle expert, Dr Col Limpus, provided a presentation regarding turtle interactions with crab apparatus. StrandNet data reports approximately 400 turtle interactions from 2010 to 2021 in Moreton Bay. Turtle interactions with crab apparatus result in entanglement in float lines and entrapment in pots, including ghost pots. Initial data has shown that entanglement and entrapment is more prevalent with light-weight recreational crab pots. Recommendations were provided to the working group and Fisheries Queensland for consideration to reduce effort in high turtle population areas and change crab apparatus to limit interactions.

    Members agreed that cheap, light-weight crab pots are the major contributors to turtle interactions with crab apparatus.

    Members discussed a range of bycatch mitigations strategies to address WTO conditions relating to turtle interactions with crab apparatus. Options were presented to the working group for discussion with members providing feedback on all options. To address the current WTO conditions, members discussed possible changes to gear design to minimise turtles entering crab pots. Other options to be considered further are the use of weighted float lines to prevent surface entanglements. A phase out of light-weight crab pots was also recommended.

    Fisheries Queensland will undertake to develop a risk mitigation strategy to address turtle interactions with crab apparatus. Once developed, the risk mitigation strategy will be released for public consultation in early 2022. In addition, Fisheries Queensland will be consulting with all licence holders in relation to the export component (Part 13A) of future WTO applications noting the current approval expires on 27 May 2022.The responsible crabbing guide will also be reviewed as an immediate priority.

    Members raised the need for mud crab tagging and the progress of female mud crab research including the possibility of extending the research to the take of female blue swimmer crabs. The number of pots on blue swimmer crab trotlines and potential retention of bycatch in the blue swimmer crab fishery was also raised for consideration. Trend data about effort post quota allocation will need to be monitored.

    The next crab working group meeting is scheduled for May 2022 with discussions to include:

    • An update on research progress and preliminary findings
    • An update on the WTO status and by-catch mitigation strategies
    • Progress on the phase-out of light weight crab pots
    • Review of the fishery performance post quota implementation
  • 13-14 June 2022

    The 12th Crab Working Group meeting was held in Brisbane on 13 and 14 June 2022. The purpose of the meeting was to note the progress of reform implementation to the mud and blue swimmer crab fisheries and update of current research.

    Fisheries Queensland provided a general update on the Sustainable Fisheries Strategy (the Strategy) and Working Group expression of Interest (EOI) processes.  Members provided an update on fishing operations in their local areas. Commercial operators noted:

    • Some reluctance to using the commercial fishing app, citing technical issues with the app and difficulties adapting to a new reporting method.
    • Issues raised with inshore net practices, specifically crabs being deliberately destroyed to remove them from nets. This represents unaccounted fishing mortality. The working group noted that this is an offence under fisheries legislation and Fisheries Queensland undertook to raise the matter with the East Coast Inshore and Gulf of Carpentaria working groups.
    • Fishing operations have been impacted by weather, including inability to access fishing areas.
    • Rising ongoing operational costs impacting profitability.

    Other issues raised by members for further consideration by Fisheries Queensland:

    • Removal of requirement of flags (for the sand crab fishery)
    • Increasing number of pots on trot lines (for the sand crab fishery)
    • Reviewing retained permitted species– such as octopus, bugs and slipper lobsters
    • Distinguishing between recreational and commercial pots, e.g. through different dimensions
    • Review of the seven day servicing rule, for example, clarifying exceptional circumstances where pots can’t be serviced
    • Lightweight pot removal
    • Review of bycatch mitigation
    • Vessel tracking reliability
    • Clarifying wording of “whole mud crab” for reporting
    • Clarify the original intent of the retained species under 3 C1 rules (i.e. permitted species)

    Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol provided a compliance update, and discussed issues observed in the field, including the recent audit in the C1 fishery, bycatch issues, Unregulated sale, Pot clean-ups.

    Fisheries Queensland presented the catch and effort data for the crab 2021 season, and the Total Allowable Commercial Catch (TACC) for the 2022-2023 season. The TACC has not changed for the 2022-2023 season (770 tonnes EC1, 108 tonnes GC1, 263 tonnes BC1). It was noted as quota for 2022-23 will be issued over a full 12 month fishing season rather than 10 months, resulting the unit value will changing. Letters are being issued to authority holders to advise them of the change.

    The Harvest Strategy breakout rule 1.7 was discussed and Queensland Fisheries will investigate amending the assessment year from 2023-2024 to 2024-2025 to provide some flexibility given industry consolidation had been delayed following the recent introduction of a quota-managed system.

    Agri-science Queensland presented current progress on mud crab research. Research is being undertaken to increase understanding of spatial stock structure of Giant Mud Crabs, development of a monitoring program for Giant Mud Crabs and spawning migration of female Giant Mud Crabs. Working group members were encouraged to promote participation in research activities.

    Crab working group members discussed the potential for an experimental trial into the take of female mud crabs limited to the C1 commercial fishers in the Gulf of Carpentaria. The working group discussed options and raised a range of considerations for and against the trial take of female mud crabs. There were concerns this trial was only considered for mud crabs and not blue swimmer crabs. The working group requested operational conditions be developed on this subject and presented at subsequent working group meetings before providing further recommendations.

    Fisheries Queensland provided a demonstration of the new Queensland commercial fishing app (QLD eFisher) which fishers can use for reporting. The working group stepped through a workflow for a crab trip and made suggestions for improvement. Feedback was generally positive on both the app and FQ customer support. Working group members are encouraged to promote upcoming Fisheries Queensland training workshops amongst their networks.

    The working group noted the recent research on speartooth sharks in the Wenlock and Ducie Rivers. Industry advised that proactive measures had already been introduced by some commercial fishers in this region. The group discussed potential mitigation options to minimize speartooth shark interactions with mud crab pots, and industry members indicated they would like to see closer collaboration between apparatus manufacturers, industry and researchers. The working group noted bycatch may occur in other fisheries in the area and this required further investigation.

    The working group noted the update on the blue swimmer and mud crab WTO. Part 13 accreditation remains in place for the blue swimmer crab and mud crab fisheries. Fisheries Queensland advised that following consultation with industry a decision has been made not to reapply for Part 13A, which covers export approvals, at this time.

    The working group noted an FRDC grant has been awarded to Agri-Science Queensland to progress research to collate information on escape vents and marine turtle interactions with crab pots (including ghost pots) and consider pot configurations(s) that could contribute to a risk mitigation strategy for marine turtles in the Queensland crab fishery.

    In general business, the working group discussed the issues around the sinking of crab pots, incidental catch of mud crab in sand crab apparatus, and the removal of trot lines in Moreton Bay, but did not support progressing these matters for further consideration.

    The next meeting of the Crab Working Group will be held in late November 2022.

  • 30 March 2023

    The 13th Crab Working Group meeting was held via teleconference. The purpose of the meeting was to note the continuing implementation of reform to the crab fishery and to discuss the total allowable commercial catch (TACC) for the 2023-24 fishing year for mud crab and blue swimmer crab.

    Agri-science Queensland provided a written update on current progress on mud crab research for noting by the working group members. The working group noted the participation of many recreational and commercial fishers in the joint research project to report sightings of egg-bearing female mud crabs. Several crab research projects are continuing.

    Fisheries Queensland provided a general update on the Sustainable Fisheries Strategy (the Strategy), noted that the Great Sandy Marine Park zoning review was underway, and that a working group expression of interest (EOI) process was imminent. Fisheries Queensland also updated the working group on the status of developmental fishing activities which have operated adjacent to the commercial crab fishery.

    Fisheries Queensland advised members of the status of several proposed legislative amendments for the crab fisheries. These include the removal of lightweight pots, pot sizes for commercial and recreational sectors, maximum number of pots permitted on trot lines, and marking requirements for trot lines. These will be considered in a broader review process across multiple fisheries requiring public consultation.

    The working group noted the Wildlife Trade Operation (WTO) Part 13A (export) accreditation under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) remains revoked for mud crab and blue swimmer crab. Part 13 accreditation under the EPBC Act remains in place for the blue swimmer crab and mud crab fisheries.

    The working group discussed the National Mud Crab workshop held in October 2022. Members who attended provided positive feedback about this workshop and the opportunities for collaboration across jurisdictions.

    Members provided an update on fishing operations in their local areas. Commercial operators in the Gulf of Carpentaria noted that catch rates are high despite extreme weather events affecting operations and movement of catch to market. Gulf of Carpentaria quota is currently trading at $125/kg with 13 major quota owners, including 9 owner operators. On the east coast, the season has been steady with large crabs (approximately 2kg) being caught around central Queensland, despite limited rain. Some commercial operators are experiencing low catch rates in Gladstone Harbour, with the Gladstone Healthy Harbour Report stating a decline in mud crab stocks within Gladstone Harbour has occurred. Observed depletions on the east coast may be due to the continued take of B and C grade crabs in the commercial and recreational sectors. Members in the blue swimmer crab fishery have recently observed low catch rates both offshore and inside the bays. Wholesale prices for blue swimmer crab have remained steady for operators. Members raised ongoing concerns with trawl interactions with commercial blue swimmer crab pots. Recreational members in Moreton Bay observed that activity has been quiet over the past month and noted that weather, temperature and water quality factors may be affecting recreational catch.

    The GBRMPA representative advised that the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority remains interested to see progress on by-catch mitigation and a prohibition on lightweight pots, which will contribute to meeting the conditions of the Part 13 accreditations under the EPBC Act. The member noted potential concern with the current east coast mud crab TACC as the 2022 catch only slightly exceeded the 70% catch required to avoid triggering decision rule 1.7 of the mud crab harvest strategy (the breakout rule), despite apparent high effort and significant catch of B and C grade crabs.

    Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol provided a compliance update, and members discussed issues observed in the field. QBFP have implemented a new intelligence and monitoring system (FIMS), which provides real-time access to compliance information and data to officers in the field. QBFP officers across all regions have undertaken education activities with commercial and recreational fisherman about their obligations with positive results. Escape vent compliance for commercial operators, for example, is high. Some ongoing issues with vessel tracking offences and uptake of the eFisher app for reporting are being managed. The issue of black marketing of crabs remains a priority for enforcement. QBFP encourages all commercial fishers to contact their local district office if there are specific enforcement concerns in their area.

    Fisheries Queensland proposed the following in relation to Total Allowable Commercial Catches (TACCs) for the upcoming season commencing on 1 July 2023:

    • no change to blue swimmer crab TACC from 263,000kg
    • no change to east coast mud crab TACC from 770,000kg
    • no change to Gulf of Carpentaria mud crab TACC from 108,000kg.

    The working group endorsed these proposed TACCs for the 2023-24 fishing year. Members noted that while decision rule 1.7 of the mud crab harvest strategy (the breakout rule) was not triggered to reduce the TACC for mud crabs on the east coast or in the Gulf of Carpentaria, there is concern that a large proportion of the catch on the east coast may be B and C grade crabs.

    The working group was presented with a letter from four commercial east coast mud crab fishers proposing several management measures to address fishing effort in the east coast mud crab fishery. These measures included requiring a commercial fisher to hold two C1 symbols on their primary licence to participate in the fishery, and increasing the minimum quota holding requirement from 1,200kg to 3,500kg to commence fishing. A number of these measures were previously considered by the working group when developing the harvest strategy and the move to individual transferable quota (ITQ). While there was some support for the proposed measures, the working group preferred to continue with the management arrangements under the current mud crab harvest strategy at this time.

    The requirement for commercial fishers to check crab apparatus at least every 7 days after being set was also raised, as some commercial fishers have raised concerns that this requirement does not allow for leniency, even in exceptional circumstances such as ill health. Fisheries Queensland advised that QBFP officers can apply discretion in circumstances where a genuine reason can be provided. Fishers are encouraged to discuss any concerns about their capacity to check crab apparatus within 7 days with their local QBFP District Officer.

    The working group discussed a proposal to trial the commercial take of female mud crabs in the Gulf of Carpentaria. Some members supported a trial but noted the advice already provided to trial proponents that Fisheries Queensland is awaiting the outcomes of FRDC research before further consideration will be made. Additionally, the completion of the first five-year harvest strategy will demonstrate sustainable management under quota arrangements, prove compliance, and reduce black marketing of mud crab. Fisheries Queensland advised that management arrangements for the fishery are not anticipated to be significantly changed until these outcomes have been demonstrated, however trial arrangements can continue to be considered.

    A proposal for a transhipment strategy in the Gulf of Carpentaria was discussed. This proposal would seek to allow holders of primary licences owned or leased in the name of a single entity to land catches on board a single holding vessel owned by the same entity. Members were generally not supportive due to concerns of increased localised effort from holders of primary licences moving into and operating in areas which cannot sustain increased effort or increased pressure on local mud crab stocks.

    Working group members discussed a proposal to allow the temporary transfer of fishery symbols between primary licences. Members expressed support, although noting that this is currently possible through third-party agreements between primary licence holders. Fisheries Queensland noted to investigate opportunities to streamline current processes to enable temporary transfer of symbols to be enabled, noting that consultation between representatives from all commercial fisheries and Fisheries Queensland is required.

    Fisheries Queensland will update the Responsible Crabbing Guide for recreational fishers. Education activities will be progressed to raise awareness of B and C grade crabs for recreational fishers. The working group also reiterated the need for action to be taken to remove lightweight crab pots from both commercial and recreational sectors. The working group encouraged efforts to enable greater reporting of recreational catch across all fisheries.

    The next working group meeting is planned to be held in October 2023.

    Attendees

    Members: Fisheries Queensland (Chair – Mark Doohan, Sian Breen, Jeffrey Ikin, Rhys Watson, Rob McDonald), Commercial Fishing (Anne Tooker, Ben Day, Keith Harris, Paul Hyland), Recreational Fishing (David Bateman; first hour only), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend)

    Observers: Sustainable Fisheries Expert Panel (Ian Tibbetts, Natalie Stoeckl).

    Apologies

    Members: Commercial Fishing (Matthew Vickers, Nicholas Burr), Recreational Fishing (George Bennetts, Wayne Bonham), Agri-Science Queensland (Julie Robins), Kord Luckus (Fishing Tackle Industry)

    Observers: Dr Richard Pillans (CSIRO).

  • 15 September 2023

    The 14th Crab Working Group meeting was held via teleconference. The purpose of the meeting was to note the continuing implementation of reform to the crab fishery and to consult on a proposed discussion paper for the C1 fishery.

    Fisheries Queensland provided a general update on the phase-out of gillnet fishing in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and changes to commercial fishing in the Great Sandy Marine Park.

    The working group noted the current working group membership will continue until the expression of interest (EOI) process to renew the crab working group membership will be finalised shortly. The current membership will continue until the EOI process is finalised.

    Fisheries Queensland advised members that catch data submitted through logbooks is currently being entered and reviewed and will inform fishery management of trends with the crab fishery. Members noted and agreed stock assessments are an important mechanism to inform the total allowable commercial catch (TACC) of a fishery. The decision rules in the harvest strategy consider the outputs of a stock assessment and aim to achieve a target biomass of 60% as a proxy for maximum economic yield. If the biomass is at or above the target reference point (60% exploitable biomass), the TACC will be set at a level that maintains this biomass.

    Members provided an update on fishing operations in their local areas. Commercial members noted the price of mud crab is low across Queensland. On the east coast, members have noticed more large crabs being caught in some regions. Members in the blue swimmer crab fishery have observed steady catch rates while the wholesale prices for green blue swimmer crabs have dropped. Members continued discussions of the take of B and C grade crabs in the commercial and recreational sectors. The working group noted reports of good catches observed by recreational representatives in Moreton Bay.

    Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol (QBFP) provided an update on the Responsible Crabbing Guide for recreational fishers and noted that it will be released soon. QBFP noted that compliance has been high in both commercial and recreational sectors. Members noted potential reporting issue in the Gulf of Carpentaria. QBFP provided an update on ongoing crab pot clean ups and encourages commercial fishers to contact their local district officer regarding should they have any compliance concerns. QBFP noted that tagging would assist in controlling black marketing.

    The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) representative reiterated the Reef Authority’s interest in progressing a prohibition lightweight crab pots and interested in a bycatch mitigation strategy for the crab fishery, and on current research into female mud crabs and turtle interactions with crab gear. The representative also reiterated they were eager to hear how the Individual Transferrable Quota (ITQ) management and other reform is working towards a sustainable fishery.

    The Food Innovation team within Agri-Science Queensland presented on the mud crab traceability project. The project focuses on building a traceability data infrastructure to track provenance and quality in Australian seafood supply chains, with a focus on Queensland mud crab fisheries. Commercial fishers are encouraged to get involved in the project, with several working group members interested.

    Agri-science Queensland provided an update on current mud crab research and development. Agri-science noted the need for further discussions on regulated escape vents in commercial pots to be reviewed due to limited effectiveness of one of the allowed vents. They noted the general decline in reported catch and effort in the mud crab fisheries since the introduction of Vessel Monitoring Systems and ITQ, although nominal catch rates have increased. It was noted the next stock assessment for the fishery is due in year-5 of the Harvest Strategy (2025/26).. Members noted marine turtle interactions are concentrated in south-east Queensland and are particularly caused by lightweight apparatus.

    The working group reiterated the need to remove lightweight crab pots from both commercial and recreational sectors. Fisheries Queensland indicated that a discussion paper for public consultation is proposed for the near future including the removal of lightweight crab pots.

    The working group briefly discussed the commercial take of female crabs. Fisheries Queensland reiterated they are awaiting the outcomes of FRDC research before further considerations.

    A document drafted by the Queensland Mud Crab Consortium was circulated amongst fisheries stakeholders and discussed with the working group. Commercial representatives have conflicting views of proposals in the document. Members were advised of a survey that Queensland Seafood Industry Associated conducted in response to the document. The survey results will be distributed to Fisheries Queensland.

    The working group discussed the following topics to address effort shift concerns in the fishery. Working group members had conflicting views, and it was noted there are also different views amongst industry. Fisheries Queensland noted no decisions have been made and a discussion paper will be released for public consultation to all C1 licence holders electronically and via mail post.

    The following proposals from industry were discussed. No decisions have been made:

    • decreasing the Total Allowable Commercial Catch (TACC) and increasing the minimum quota requirement: Some commercial and recreational representatives noted concerns that for the previous two years, the east coast mud crab TACC only slightly exceeded the 70% catch required to avoid triggering decision rule 1.7 of the harvest strategy (the breakout rule). There was concern that B and C grade crab are being taken to reach the minimum requirement and the impacts involved. Some commercial and recreational members supported the current harvest strategy arrangements to run its course and if the TACC does not meet 70%, the breakout rule 1.7 will be implemented. Working group members noted a need for a mechanism in the harvest strategy to review catch and effort data and increase TACC if needed.
    • Require 2 x C1’s on PCFL to commercially fish: Some commercial members raised concerns regarding latent effort and the possibility for effort shift into the C1 fishery due to the phase-out of gill netting in the Great Barrier Reef. There were mixed views on the proposal for two C1’s symbols to operate in the C1 fishery, with some commercial operators supporting and other opposing the proposed idea.
    • Require tagging of crabs: Commercial members raised concerns about the extra time and resources required to tag crabs. A commercial member carrying out tagging on a voluntary basis noted although it does require further effort and time, tagging crabs is a beneficial marketing tool and can assist with compliance and reporting. The working group noted tagging in the recreational sector would benefit knowledge of recreational catch of crabs.
    • Clarify the scope of the C1 fishery: Fisheries Queensland sought advice on how access to the deepwater crystal crab resource might be managed, noting spanner crabs were set up as a separate fishery several years ago. Working group members generally did not support splitting off the entitlement to catch crystal deepwater crab, noting there are existing deep-sea fishers in C1 areas. Fisheries Queensland noted the different operational mechanisms required to deep-sea fish and associated risks such as interactions with threatened, endangered, or protected (TEP) species. Exploration of deep-sea fisheries crab under the C1 symbol may trigger a review of the wildlife trade operation (WTO) conditions, which may impact all C1 licence holders. Public consultation is proposed on this issue.
    • Amend wording of intact mud crab in reporting: The working group noted the uncertainty of what ‘whole fish’ means in the context of crabs when conducting reporting which possibly results in unreported catch. Members advised the definition to be an individual crab with a carapace, regardless of any missing appendages.
    • Count crabs instead of weight: Some members noted current reporting requirements involving counting and weighing crabs is onerous. Fisheries Queensland noted there may be a need to investigate regional differences in mud crab size and consider how the change could be implemented.
    • Close Eurimbula Creek to all crabbing and prohibit crabbing apparatus: The working group noted the creek is currently a mud crab sanctuary and is creating an enforcement issue for QBFP and park rangers due to crab apparatus being set to take other crabs which are likely also catching mud crabs. Members supported to closing the creek to prohibit the take of all crabs and the use of all crabbing apparatus.
    • Review requirements for trotlines to replace flags with buoys and increase number of pots permitted on a trotline; Members supported the review of the requirement for a flag to be attached to one end of the trotline. Members indicated it is a safety issue to commercial offshore crab fishers and recreational boat users. The working group discussed the limit on the number of permitted pots on a trotline does not allow efficiency in the offshore crab fishery. Additional trotlines can lead to entanglements with TEP species and safety hazards.

    The next working group is proposed to be held in-person in March 2024.

    Attendees

    Members: Fisheries Queensland (Acting Chair – Jeffrey Ikin, Lauren Jubb, Rob McDonald, Dallas D’Silva), Commercial Fishing (Anne Tooker, Benjamin Day, Keith Harris, Matthew Vickers, Paul Hyland), Recreational Fishing (David Bateman, George Bennetts), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend) Agri-Science Queensland (Julie Robins),

    Observers: Agri-Science Queensland (Donna Cawthorn, Paul Exley).

    Apologies

    Members: Fisheries Queensland (Mark Doohan, Sian Breen), Commercial Fishing (Nicholas Burr), Recreational Fishing (Wayne Bonham), Kord Luckus (Fishing Tackle Industry)

  • 30 March 2024

    The 15th crab working group meeting was held in Brisbane on 20 March 2024. The main purpose of the meeting was to discuss the total allowable commercial catch (TACC) for the 2024-25 fishing year for the mud crab and blue swimmer crab fisheries. The working group noted Fisheries Queensland have released discussion papers on reforms to the commercial crab proposed by parts of industry and recreational fishing and are seeking feedback from stakeholders.

    The working group reiterated the support to remove lightweight crab pots from recreational sectors. Fisheries Queensland encouraged stakeholders to submit feedback in the discussion papers currently open for public consultation on a number of recreational fishing reforms. Stakeholders were encouraged to provide feedback by 9 May 2024. It was noted that a meeting of the working group will be held mid-year to discuss the consultation outcomes.

    Fisheries Queensland provided a general update on the future fishing structural adjustment scheme. Working group members noted the applications for voluntary symbol buy-backs have been extended to 30 April 2024. Other payments under the scheme, including ex-gratia payments are available until 30 June 2024. Further details of other schemes, including boat refits and acquisition of nets, are yet to be finalised. It was emphasised by the working group these need to occur as soon possible as industry are currently disposing of nets.

    The working group noted all fisheries working groups have been re-appointed, alongside modifications to the working group guidelines and terms of reference. Since the re-appointment of working group members, the Gulf of Carpentaria inshore fishery working group met to discuss consultation results on the proposed gillnet free zones that will be implemented 17 May this year. The trawl working group met to discuss the most recent stock assessment results as well as the continuing work to assess the ecological risks associated with trawl fisheries and bycatch mitigation measures. The Cape York special fisheries working group met on 28-29 February where a strategic plan and opportunities for economic development in the Cape region were central to the discussion.

    Members provided an update on fishing operations in their local areas. Commercial representatives advised the start of the season for parts of north Queensland were challenging but a good year on average. Members noted leasing EC1 (east coast mud crab) quota is readily available, and the price of mud crab was down compared to previous years. Prices during the lunar new year were also down reflecting current economic conditions. Working group members expressed frustration over continuing investments warnings limiting their ability to leverage on their fishing assets.

    The lack of First Nations and blue swimmer crab representation on the current working group was noted. Fisheries Queensland will continue to work with stakeholders to ensure appropriate representation is on the working group.

    Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol (QBFP) noted they have enhanced enforcement capability by five additional investigators targeting the influx of black marketing, noting tagging crabs would assist in controlling black marketing. QBFP provided an update on ongoing crab pot clean ups and encourages commercial fishers to contact their local district officer should they have any compliance concerns.

    The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority representative reiterated the Reef Authority’s interest in progressing a prohibition on lightweight crab pots to address issues of vulnerable and protected species interactions, ghost fishing and marine debris. The member advised the Reef Authority is currently updating their fishing position statement and progressing regulation amendments to maintain complementarity with Queensland’s implementation of future fishing reforms.

    Agri-Science Queensland presented on fisheries research and development corporations (FRDC) current mud crab research progress noted by working group members. Project FRDC 2021-119 is the trialling and refining escape vents to release bycatch and undersized crab and collate information on marine turtle interactions with crabbing apparatus. Agri-Science Queensland also presented video footage of mud crabs manoeuvring out of various escape vent specifications noting different behaviours. Project FRDC 2019-062 is researching mud crab biology and the fishery to support assessment and management. Both projects are intended to be submitted to FRDC this financial year.

    Fisheries Queensland provided an update on the Qld eFisher app since its release in December 2021. 142 C1 fishers have used the app for reporting for more than 20,000 crab fishing trips. Since the start of 2024, 31% of logbooks have come from the app compared with 69% using paper logbooks (for all fisheries that can use the app). For the crab fishery, 41% of vessels have submitted their logbooks from the app since the start of this year. The lack of resourcing in the timely entry of logbook data was noted by working group members. Commercial fishers are encouraged to adopt eFisher to create efficiencies and timeliness. Members noted the app is generally well supported amongst industry, though training may be required to encourage further uptake across the fishery.

    Fisheries Queensland advised the following TACCs for the upcoming season commencing on 1 July 2024 based on the decisions rules in relevant harvest strategies not being triggered:

    • no change to blue swimmer crab TACC from 263,000kg
    • no change to East Coast mud crab TACC from 770,000kg
    • no change to Gulf of Carpentaria mud crab TACC from 108,000kg.

    The working group noted these proposed TACCs for the 2024-25 fishing year. Some members noted the need to review the harvest strategy more frequently, specifically setting the TACC and decision rules. Working group members requested the next meeting include discussions on price index trends over the past decade as well as regional and species breakdowns.

    The Food Innovation team within Agri-Science Queensland presented on the mud crab traceability project which focuses on building a traceability data infrastructure enabled by tagging crabs to track provenance and quality in Australian seafood supply chains, with a focus on Queensland mud crab fisheries. Commercial fishers are encouraged to get involved in the project.

    Working group members noted tagging crabs is a beneficial marketing tool and can assist with compliance, reporting and prevent black marketing. Some commercial members raised concerns about the extra time and resources required to tag crabs working group members noted reporting and tagging the harvest of crabs in the recreational sector would benefit knowledge of crabs.

    Working group members supported reinstating the wildlife trade operation (WTO) Part 13A (export) accreditation under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) that was revoked for mud crab and blue swimmer crab in December 2021. Fisheries Queensland noted that there will be a need to consider next steps and commence negotiation with Commonwealth around what types of conditions may be necessary, and whether this would have implications for management and monitoring.

    Commercial representatives noted they would like to investigate third party accreditation for the future of the commercial crabbing industry.

    Fisheries Queensland noted the different operational mechanisms required to deep-sea fish and associated risks such as interactions with TEP species and unexploited biomass of crab species. Exploration of deep-sea fisheries crab under the C1 symbol may trigger a review of the WTO conditions, which may impact all C1 licence holders. The discussion paper that is currently out for public consultation includes clarifying the scope of C1 on this topic, and all stakeholders were encouraged to comment.

    Members provided an update on the collaborative work by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and DAF being done with industry members on spear tooth shark research reducing bycatch in a commercial crab fishery. Industry have been reporting spear tooth captures and collecting data on catch rates of pots with shark excluders using datasheets provided by CSIRO.

    The next crab fishery working group meeting is proposed to be after consultation closes on the commercial crab discussion paper to discuss survey results.

    Attendees

    Members: Chair – Angela Mordocco (Agri-Science Queensland), Fisheries Queensland (Dallas D’Silva, Sian Breen, Michelle Wenner, Thomas Hatley, Lauren Jubb, Rob McDonald (Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol)), Commercial Fishing (Anne Tooker, Benjamin Coyne, Bradley Perkins, Matthew Homann), Fishing Tackle Industry (Corrine Aiken), Seafood wholesaler (Shawn McAtamney), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (James Aumend), Agri-Science Queensland (Julie Robins).

    Observers: Agri-Science Queensland (Paul Exley), Fisheries Queensland eFisher (Peta Schofield)

    Apologies

    Members: Recreational Fishing (George Bennetts).

Terms of reference

The Queensland Government is committed to ensuring fisheries resources are managed in a sustainable and responsible manner that recognises the interests of all Queenslanders. An important part of fisheries management is stakeholder engagement through working groups.

Working groups provide advice within the scope of this terms of reference, which is considered alongside advice, information and requirements from Fisheries Queensland, the Sustainable Fisheries Expert Panel and other government agencies, as well as feedback from public consultation. Collectively, this informs decisions on the management of our fisheries.

Queensland’s crab fishery is an iconic fishery easily accessible by commercial, recreational, charter and traditional fishing sectors. The crab fishery encompasses the harvest of both mud and blue swimmer crabs in Queensland waters. Mud crabs are harvested throughout the state’s coastal waters, including the Gulf of Carpentaria and Queensland’s eastern coastline. Harvest of blue swimmer crabs is traditionally focused around both the inshore and offshore waters of Moreton Bay, the Sunshine Coast and Hervey Bay.

Targeted harvest of mud crabs and blue swimmer crabs occurs using baited crab pots or collapsible pots. Trawlers are also able to retain limited quantities of blue swimmer crabs if caught.

The commercial crab fishery is a limited entry commercial fishery, with 410 licences (C1 symbols) attached to 343 separate commercial fishing boat licences and significant recreational take. Licence holders are bound by compulsory reporting arrangements, tracking systems, special management zones, minimum size limits and no take of female crabs. Additional fishing effort limits are placed on licence holders via vessel size and number of apparatus that can be used at one time.

While both species have protections for female and undersized crabs, there are ongoing concerns about overcapacity in the fishery, competition between sectors and black-marketing due to the high value of products from this fishery. The high prices obtained for crabs continue to present risks of black-marketing, which undermines the sustainability of crab stocks and economic viability of the commercial fishery.

The Queensland crab fishery is transitioning towards three management units to manage the take of mud and blue swimmer crabs. Management of the fishery is governed by the mud crab and blue swimmer crabs. Management of the fishery is governed by the mud crab and blue swimmer crab harvest strategies and are currently in year three of five of implementation.

Purpose of the working group

The working group will provide advice on the operational aspects of the management of fishing in the crab fishery.

Objectives

  1. To assist with implementation of mud crab and blue swimmer crab harvest strategies, including advice on management options and fishing rules, consistent with the Queensland harvest strategy policy and the Fisheries Act 1994.
  2. To assist with the implementation, including advice on management options and fishing rules, consistent with the Mud Crab and Blue Swimmer Crab Harvest Strategies, the Queensland Harvest Strategy Policy and the Fisheries Act 1994.
  3. To provide general advice to Fisheries Queensland on any operational matters, emerging issues and general management of Queensland’s crab fishery.

Working group roles

The role of working group members is to:

  • provide operational advice to Fisheries Queensland on particular fisheries, management and fishing methods
  • assist with the implementation of harvest strategies
  • consider information and provide advice on fishery performance (e.g. catch rates, fishing power)
  • assist with identifying ways to best manage broader ecosystem impacts of fishing
  • provide advice on emerging issues (e.g. compliance, data, legislation, research) and meeting Wildlife Trade Operation approval conditions under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
  • disseminate factual information back to a broad range of other stakeholders in the fishery and provide other stakeholders’ feedback to the working group for discussion.

The role of Fisheries Queensland is to:

  • provide direction for working groups in the form of a work program
  • arrange meeting times and provide logistical support for meetings
  • prepare and distribute meeting materials to support the effective operation of the working group.
  • provide information and data to support the work of the working group
  • provide a point of communication between the working group, other working groups and the Sustainable Fisheries Expert Panel in accordance with each terms of reference
  • maintain communication with the working group members at least every three months.

Obligations and responsibilities of members

Being a working group member has important obligations and responsibilities. In accepting the appointment, members must be prepared to:

  1. contribute knowledge of, and experience in, Queensland’s fisheries
  2. consult with stakeholder peers through port-level or regional associations and networks, representative bodies and other avenues as necessary to ensure as many stakeholder views as possible are considered as part of working group discussions – members will be asked to report on broader views, not just their view as a member, including how the feedback was gathered and who it represents
  3. constructively participate in discussions to achieve acceptable outcomes
  4. respect the views expressed by other members
  5. act in the best interests of the fishery as a whole, rather than as an advocate for any particular individual, organisation, interest group or regional interest
  6. avoid pursuing personal agendas or self-interest, and participate in discussion in an objective and impartial manner
  7. promptly advise the Chair in writing (or announce at the start of a meeting) of any conflict-of-interest issues that arise, including those that may be perceived by others or have the potential be a conflict, subsequent to appointment
  8. conduct themselves in a manner that is consistent with the Queensland community’s expectations for reasonable conduct at all times – this requires a commitment to honest, fair and respectful engagement, including showing respect towards all persons involved in working group business.

Unreasonable behaviour will not be accepted. An appointed member may be removed from a meeting or in the case of serious and/or repetitive conduct removed from a working group if their conduct is contrary to the role, obligations or responsibilities as a working group member.

In either circumstance, the appointed Chair will provide a verbal warning if unreasonable behaviour is displayed at a meeting. Following this, the Chair has discretion to remove a person from the meeting. A record should be made in the meeting notes. If the unreasonable behaviour is displayed at a number of meetings and/or associated with working group business outside a meeting, the appointed Chair will write to the member to provide an opportunity to remedy the behaviour. If there is no change in behaviour or remedy, the Chair will refer the matter to the Executive Director, Fisheries Queensland, for formal review of the member’s membership.

Unreasonable behaviour includes abusive, threatening and other behaviours that may also become ‘unreasonable’ when, because of its nature or frequency it raises health, safety, resource or equity issues for those participating in the working group or others engaging with working group business.

Abusive behaviour is defined as directed at the individual, including foul, racist, sexist or demeaning language. Aggressive behaviour includes angry outbursts, which although not directly or explicitly threatening, are in an intimidating tone and intensity. Threatening behaviour is specific or explicit statements that a reasonable person would interpret as a real and serious communication of an intent to inflict harm on the person receiving the call or another person, or employees of the organisation in general, or to inflict damage or take other hostile action against departmental or meeting location property.

Other actions or behaviours which may, depending on the circumstances, be considered unreasonable conduct include unrelenting/repetitive contact (excessive contact, refusing to accept an outcome, lodging the same claim over again), demanding conduct (demanding a different outcome, demanding impossible, impractical disproportionate outcomes), unreasonable lack of cooperation (withholding or providing incomplete information, intentionally providing overwhelming volumes of information) and unreasonable arguments (argumentative or irrational conduct, conspiracy allegations, making vexatious complaints).

Meeting administration

The operation of the working group will consist of regular meetings via online meeting platforms (i.e. Microsoft Teams) or in person where resources allow.

Fisheries Queensland will prepare the agenda, including an opportunity at the start of each meeting for members to raise concerns, and supporting documents 14 days ahead of each meeting. Review of these documents will be required prior to the meeting in order to participate effectively.

The appointed Chair will manage the meeting according to the agenda, review status of action items from previous meetings, ensure a summary and actions for each agenda item are recorded and a communique for the meeting is prepared. The Chair will also address any conflicts of interest and manage the conduct of all members and observers present at the meeting.

Fisheries Queensland will publish the conline within three days of the meeting and notify other stakeholders of its publication. Within 14 days of the meeting, Fisheries Queensland will prepare meeting notes and circulate them to members, allowing 14 days for member comments before being finalised. Where required, action items will be followed up by Fisheries Queensland to seek to resolve them and any operational issues tabled by the working group ahead of the following meeting.

Sensitive information and non-disclosure

Some information that is sensitive in nature is provided to working group members to enable them to provide the best advice to Fisheries Queensland on the specific fishery. Given this, members may be asked to:

  • exercise tact and discretion when dealing with sensitive issues – if a member is unsure or concerned about the disclosure to non-members, the member must seek advice from the Chair
  • act honestly and exercise care and diligence in the discharge of their duties at all times and not make improper use of working group information – improper use would be if a member gains an advantage either directly or indirectly (financial or otherwise) over another person or causes detriment to the working group’s work or to another person
  • not publish or communicate to any person, that they are not authorised to publish or communicate, any information that comes to their knowledge or possession because they are a member of the working group.

If sensitive information is used as part of a working group meeting, Fisheries Queensland will advise working group members to help them comply with these requirements.

Conflict of interest

A conflict of interest occurs when private interests interfere, or appear to interfere, with the performance of official duties. All members must perform their role/contribute in a fair and unbiased way, ensuring that decisions made are not impacted by self-interest, private affiliations, or the likelihood of gain or loss for them or others. Private interests include personal, professional or business interests, as well as the interests of individuals that you associate with, such as family, dependants and friends.

Conflicts of interest fall into three categories – actual (there is a direct conflict between your current duties and your existing private interests), potential (your role and private interests could conflict in the future) and perceived (it could appear that your private interests could improperly influence the performance of your role). Conflicts of interest can be pecuniary (if there is a reasonable likelihood of financial loss or gain) or non-pecuniary (if there is no financial component, but may involve self-interest, personal or family relationships or other affiliations).

All conflicts of interest (actual, potential and perceived) must first be identified and declared to the Chair. Steps can then be taken to appropriately manage and resolve the matter in the public interest. Having a conflict of interest alone is not considered misconduct. However, it is important that members are open about the conflict of interest, how the conflict of interest is managed and ensuring a conflict of interest is resolved in the public interest. Once reported, the Chair will then make an assessment about what action, if any, is required to manage the conflict of interest. Members must actively participate in the process to manage or resolve conflicts of interest in the public interest and adhere to all agreed resolution strategies. If the circumstances of a member change, they should consider whether this brings about any new conflicts of interest, or changes to an existing conflict of interest.

Sitting fees

Participation on the working group is on a voluntary basis – no sitting fees will be paid.

Travel costs

Members are eligible to be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, including domestic travel and accommodation costs.

Membership

Fisheries Queensland appoints members to working groups. Unless notified and agreed, membership will be refreshed every two years to allow for rotation of different representatives and development of new industry leaders.

Name RepresentativeSector
Angela Mordocco Chair Chair
Lauren Jubb Fishery Manager (FQ) Management
Rob McDonald Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol Management
Julie Robins Fisheries Scientist (ASQ) Research/ scientific
James Aumend GBRMPA and/or Department of Environment and Science Environment
Anne Tooker Commercial Fisher Harvest
Benjamin Coyne Commercial Fisher Harvest
Bradley Perkins Commercial Fisher Harvest
Matthew Homann Commercial Fisher Harvest
Corinne Aiken Fishing tackle industry Harvest
Shawn McAtamney Seafood Processor Seafood Marketers and processors
George Bennetts Recreational Fisher Recreational Fishers